| |
Fishing for Answers
By Carl Glassman
It’s hard to imagine that tons of the Hudson’s riverbed would
be dredged without a single environmental study, hearing, or even a debate.
But when the unimaginable happened on Sept. 11, the need to remove debris
could not wait. Barges had to be brought in and the corner of the Hudson
south of Tribeca’s Pier 25 was quickly deepened by 15 feet. Some 120,000
cubic yards of river bottom were taken away.
Now researchers are asking: To what effect?








|
|
Last month, half a year after the last barge was towed
away, a small trawler with a crew of four plied those same waters,
scooping up fish and digging into the muck to find out. “Attention New
York Waterway. Research vessel Acipenser from Cornell University.
We’re under tow. Please steer clear. Thank you.”
Through a haze of unremitting rain, Anne Gallagher steered the boat
beyond the end of the pier and sent a second alert to a northbound
ferry. Having completed another 1,000-foot-long trawl of riverbed—from
seawall to pier head—she brought the Acipenser to a stop. As
the boat bobbed in the wake-churned river, research volunteers Jeremy
Dietrich and Ben Carr leaned over the stern, groaning as they pulled
in the fish-laden net and its heavy lead weights. The job was made
all the more difficult by the slippery mix of rain and hydraulic fluid
on the floor that the crew had been trying hard to sweep dry.
“If we were to slide off, we’d be inside the net.
That’s why we all wear knives,” said project manager Geofrey
Eckerlin, pointing to the sheath on his belt. “That hasn’t
happened yet.”
The catch was puny by a fisherman’s standards: some small striped
bass, several types of herring, white perch and a few anchovies. But
each was carefully weighed, measured and recorded—they are clues
to the health of the underwater habitat and its ability to recover.
Eckerlin and Gallagher are field researchers from Cornell University’s
Department of Natural Resources. Under the direction of lead researcher
Mark Bain, the two marine biologists and various volunteers have been
spending one week each month along the waters of the Hudson River
Park’s designated sanctuary, from Pier 25 to 59th Street, collecting
and examining the underwater creatures. With a one-year, $190,000
grant from the Hudson River Park Trust that they expect to parlay
into a second year of funding, the researchers are studying the effects
of the dredging on the fish and invertebrates—clams, worms,
snails, mollusks, etc.—and conducting a comprehensive inventory
of fish and invertebrates throughout the park. Their findings will
be compared to previous studies conducted by the Environmental Protection
Agency.
They will be looking at the types of fish they are catching, their
abundance, diversity and health. In the dredged area especially, they
will examine the changes over time, and how they differ from other
park areas. “Fish have choices,” said Bain, “and
dredging a section of the water there could have created an area that’s
not nearly as desirable to them.” On the other hand, he added,
deepening that corner of the river—and removing many of the
pilings of defunct piers—may actually have made the area more
attractive to fish.
As for those tiny creatures that the team scoops from the mud, Bain
said it will be important to see which species thrive there. If only
the hardiest are found to recolonize the muck, it could mean that
some unsettling changes—stirred up toxins or differences in
the mud, perhaps—have made the riverbottom less habitable.
It will be some time before there are any conclusive findings. Identifying
the invertebrates under a microscope back in the lab is a painstakingly
slow process that Gallagher has only just begun. And it will take
a couple of cycles to draw conclusions about the fish. But early evidence,
Bain said, looks encouraging. “So far we’re catching the
normal fish you’d expect in a low salt environment on the coast
and the fish seem normal in their appearance.”
What still does not seem normal, said Bain, is the absence of the
twin towers in the skyline—a thought that does not go away when
he and his upstate colleagues are in the field. Still, trawling the
city’s waters is unique. “Sampling fish with skyscrapers
in the background,” he said, “that’s pretty tough
to beat.” |
|