|
|
Residents
Scrutinize Proposed Tower for Site 5C
by Ronald Drenger
A public presentation last month on the citys plan to allow a 35-story
residential tower to be built on the undeveloped lot next to P.S. 234,
at Chambers, West and Warren streets, did little to quell community leaders
opposition to the project.
|
|
 |
Scott Resnick, the projects developer, and Brandon Haw, a
director at Foster and Partners, the London-based architecture firm
that is designing the building, unveiled renderings of the structure
and said that they had taken steps to minimize its impact on the
community.
We tried to create as slender a building as possible,
Haw said on Sept. 24 at the presentation to a Community Board 1
committee and interested local residents. The tower proposal, which
had been reduced from 40 stories earlier this year, was also made
slimmer, he said, and the design and materialsgray-tinted
glass and a light-colored metalgive a lighter touch
to the building and break down the scale. The building
breathes a breath of fresh air into the Downtown area and
looks to the future, he said.
|
But community leaders remained
unconvinced. They said that the project is much too big and would
choke the neighborhood, cutting off light, overwhelming Tribecas
small-scale buildings, congesting streets and bringing more residents
than the area and local schools can accommodate.
|
The 360-foot tower would rise on the West Street side of
the site, which is known as Site 5C, with an eight-story extension
that would extend along Chambers Street and ground-level retail
on both streets. The latest proposal includes about 480 apartments,
a 102- car underground garage, with its entrance on Warren
Street, and an 11,000-square-foot public plaza.
Haw presented the layout for an 18,000-square-foot community
center in the new building, with an entrance on Chambers Street,
a basketball court and gym equipment in the basement and multi-use
rooms for community programs on the second floor.
Bob Townley, director of Manhattan Youth, which runs a wide
range of programs for local children and would probably run
the center, said he hoped the community space could be expanded
and could include a pool.
With so many new residential units coming, the communitys
needs have grown, just as the developers and the citys
needs have grown, he said.
In response to community concerns about shadows that the building
would cast on nearby open spaces, Haw presented studies showing
that in June, afternoon shadows would reach only the southern
edge of Washington Market Park, but that in March and September,
shadows would cover much of the park at around 3 p.m.
Community members are particularly concerned about overcrowding
at local schools, including P.S. 234, which is adjacent to
Site 5C.
|
 |
|
I worry about it, Sandy Bridges, P.S. 234s principal,
said at the presentation.
The size and the way its laid out, I think its going
to destroy P.S. 234, George Olsen, a community board member
and the schools former PTA president, said later.
Resnick, the developer, said he expected a limited number
of families in this building, because it will include only studios
and one- and two-bedroom apartments.
|
|
 |
I dont really think this building will impact
on the population of your school, he said.
The city and Resnick have almost tripled the size of the overall
project compared to their initial plan for the site, but the
community center has remained at 18,000 square feet.
The city is preparing a study of the projects potential
impacts on the neighborhood. But community leaders say that
the Site 5C development must be considered together with the
larger residential project that the city wants on Site 5B,
across the street at Warren and Greenwich streets.
Resnick hopes to break ground by the end of 2004 and complete
construction in late 2006. He is seeking $200 million in tax-free
Liberty Bond financing.
Its impossible to build anything without receiving
understandable concern from the community, he said after
the presentation. I think were doing a good job
in addressing those concerns.
But Madelyn Wils, chairwoman of Community Board 1, disagreed.
It just sucks too much out of the neighborhood without
giving enough back, she said.
|
|
|